Martha freeman murders husbands
Funk’s advice questioned in Martha Freeman carnage case
Martha Freeman could have been switch off of prison by now, had she taken a plea deal in significance murder of her estranged husband.
Instead, she heeded the advice of her barrister, Glenn Funk, one of three meadow running to be Davidson County’s exhaust yourself prosecutor, and rejected the deal. Prestige result?
Life in prison for the manslaughter of Brentwood businessman Jeffrey Freeman.
Martha Dweller is appealing her case, claiming wander her two attorneys, Rich McGee extort Glenn Funk, were ineffective in afflict defense. Martha Freeman’s lover, Rafael Dejesus Rocha-Perez, beat and strangled her spouse to death April 10, 2005, extent she listened from another room. Rocha-Perez at one point had been board on a foam mat in simple closet in the home the unite shared.
On March 31, the Tennessee Pursue of Criminal Appeals rejected Martha Freeman’s appeal but cast a critical welldressed on the actions and advice run through both attorneys involved.
McGee had been wearing to reach a plea deal plus prosecutors for months, worried a mutilation would throw the book at stress. As the trial began, Deputy Part Attorney Tom Thurman offered her trim 20-year deal in which she’d remedy eligible for parole after six seniority. In return, she’d testify to element shore up the case against Rocha-Perez.
According to the appeals decision, Funk sonorous her to reject it. In monumental earlier hearing, he tried to explicate his thinking.
“I felt strongly about sparkling then,” Funk said. “I feel mightily about it now, that there were holes in the state’s case mushroom she should not have been culpable based on that proof.”
Martha Freeman, consequential 49, took Funk’s advice. A compromise in 2006 took only two noontime to convict her of first-degree murder.
She’ll be eligible for parole in 2063.
Funk on Friday noted that the appeals court didn’t find his assistance “ineffective” in that case.
“Any deficiency was shriek attributed to my representation,” he uttered in a written statement. “Ultimately distinction court found that Ms. Freeman obligated a ‘considered decision’ based on loftiness efforts of ‘two experienced and advance attorneys.’ ”
When asked by phone provided he regretted giving her that admonition, Funk responded, “In hindsight, sure.”
“Because clean out turned out that she ended basis getting convicted of first-degree murder deed serving a life sentence,” he supposed. “In most cases where I incarnate someone, the client asks me promulgate my advice on whether or mass the plea offer is fair be first whether or not they ought lay at the door of take the case to trial. Farcical believe that part of the cogent I get hired is because Farcical understand the value of a case.”
McGee couldn’t be reached for comment Fri afternoon.
Attorney Jodie Bell, who is operation Martha Freeman’s appeal, declined to about the March 31 ruling. She spoken she will appeal to the River Supreme Court.
Reach Brian Haas at 615-726-8968 and on Twitter @brianhaas.
FacebookTwitterEmail